GPU Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of specifications and performance
Performance Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
176%
176%
AMD Radeon R9 285
76%
76%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 is approximately 100% faster
Technical Specifications
| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| Graphics ProcessorDifferent | TU117 | Tonga |
| CoresDifferent | 896 | 1792 |
| TMUsDifferent | 56 | 112 |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| Memory SizeDifferent | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus WidthDifferent | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Graphics Processor
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU NameDifferent | TU117 | Tonga |
| GPU VariantDifferent | TU117-300-A1 | Tonga PRO(215-0851128) |
| ArchitectureDifferent | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process SizeDifferent | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| TransistorsDifferent | 4,700 million | 5,000 million |
| DensityDifferent | 23.5M / mm² | 13.7M / mm² |
| Die SizeDifferent | 200 mm² | 366 mm² |
| Chip PackageDifferent | BGA-960 | N/A |
Graphics Card
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| Release DateDifferent | Apr 23rd, 2019 | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| GenerationDifferent | GeForce 16 | Volcanic Islands(R9 200) |
| PredecessorDifferent | GeForce 10 | Sea Islands |
| SuccessorDifferent | GeForce 20 | Pirate Islands |
| ProductionDifferent | Active | End-of-life |
| Launch PriceDifferent | 149 USD | 249 USD |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| ReviewsDifferent | 45 in our database | 59 in our database |
Clock Speeds
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| Base ClockDifferent | 1485 MHz | N/A |
| Boost ClockDifferent | 1665 MHz | N/A |
| Memory ClockDifferent | 2001 MHz8 Gbps effective | 1375 MHz5.5 Gbps effective |
| GPU ClockDifferent | N/A | 918 MHz |
Memory
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory SizeDifferent | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory BusDifferent | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| BandwidthDifferent | 128.1 GB/s | 176.0 GB/s |
Render Config
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| Shading UnitsDifferent | 896 | 1792 |
| TMUsDifferent | 56 | 112 |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| SM CountDifferent | 14 | N/A |
| L1 CacheDifferent | 64 KB (per SM) | 16 KB (per CU) |
| L2 CacheDifferent | 1024 KB | 512 KB |
| Compute UnitsDifferent | N/A | 28 |
Theoretical Performance
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel RateDifferent | 53.28 GPixel/s | 29.38 GPixel/s |
| Texture RateDifferent | 93.24 GTexel/s | 102.8 GTexel/s |
| FP16 (half)Different | 5.967 TFLOPS (2:1) | 3.290 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| FP32 (float)Different | 2.984 TFLOPS | 3.290 TFLOPS |
| FP64 (double)Different | 93.24 GFLOPS (1:32) | 205.6 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Board Design
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| Slot Width | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
| LengthDifferent | 229 mm9 inches | 221 mm8.7 inches |
| HeightDifferent | 111 mm4.4 inches | 109 mm4.3 inches |
| WidthDifferent | 35 mm1.4 inches | 36 mm1.4 inches |
| TDPDifferent | 75 W | 190 W |
| Suggested PSUDifferent | 250 W | 450 W |
| OutputsDifferent | 1x DVI1x HDMI 2.01x DisplayPort 1.4a | 2x DVI1x HDMI 1.4a1x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Power ConnectorsDifferent | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Board NumberDifferent | PG174 SKU 0 | C766 |
Graphics Features
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectXDifferent | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCLDifferent | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| VulkanDifferent | 1.3 | 1.2.170 |
| CUDADifferent | 7.5 | N/A |
| Shader ModelDifferent | 6.8 | 6.5 |
Comparison Summary
7
Specifications Compared
8
Feature Categories
52
Detailed Features
More Comparisons with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 with other GPUs of similar performance
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Performance120%
GeForce GTX 780 Ti is 20% faster than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Compare Detailed Specs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 970
GeForce GTX 970 Performance117%
GeForce GTX 970 is 17% faster than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Compare Detailed Specs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R9 290X
Radeon R9 290X Performance117%
Radeon R9 290X is 17% faster than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Compare Detailed Specs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R9 390
Radeon R9 390 Performance115%
Radeon R9 390 is 15% faster than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Compare Detailed Specs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 570
Radeon RX 570 Performance114%
Radeon RX 570 is 14% faster than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Compare Detailed Specs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R9 290
Radeon R9 290 Performance108%
Radeon R9 290 is 8% faster than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Compare Detailed Specs
More Comparisons with AMD Radeon R9 285
Compare AMD Radeon R9 285 with other GPUs of similar performance
AMD Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition
Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Performance114%
Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition is 14% faster than AMD Radeon R9 285
Compare Detailed Specs
AMD Radeon R9 285 vs GeForce GTX 590
GeForce GTX 590 Performance114%
GeForce GTX 590 is 14% faster than AMD Radeon R9 285
Compare Detailed Specs
AMD Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon R9 280X
Radeon R9 280X Performance112%
Radeon R9 280X is 12% faster than AMD Radeon R9 285
Compare Detailed Specs
AMD Radeon R9 285 vs Radeon HD 6990
Radeon HD 6990 Performance110%
Radeon HD 6990 is 10% faster than AMD Radeon R9 285
Compare Detailed Specs
AMD Radeon R9 285 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Performance104%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is 4% faster than AMD Radeon R9 285
Compare Detailed Specs
AMD Radeon R9 285 vs GeForce GTX 680
GeForce GTX 680 Performance102%
GeForce GTX 680 is 2% faster than AMD Radeon R9 285
Compare Detailed Specs