GPU Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of specifications and performance
Performance Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
157%
157%
AMD Radeon R9 280X
86%
86%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 is approximately 71% faster
Technical Specifications
| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Graphics ProcessorDifferent | TU117 | Tahiti |
| CoresDifferent | 896 | 2048 |
| TMUsDifferent | 56 | 128 |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| Memory SizeDifferent | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus WidthDifferent | 128 bit | 384 bit |
Graphics Processor
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| GPU NameDifferent | TU117 | Tahiti |
| GPU VariantDifferent | TU117-300-A1 | Tahiti XTL(215-0821065) |
| ArchitectureDifferent | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process SizeDifferent | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| TransistorsDifferent | 4,700 million | 4,313 million |
| DensityDifferent | 23.5M / mm² | 12.3M / mm² |
| Die SizeDifferent | 200 mm² | 352 mm² |
| Chip PackageDifferent | BGA-960 | N/A |
Graphics Card
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Release DateDifferent | Apr 23rd, 2019 | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| GenerationDifferent | GeForce 16 | Volcanic Islands(R9 200) |
| PredecessorDifferent | GeForce 10 | Sea Islands |
| SuccessorDifferent | GeForce 20 | Pirate Islands |
| ProductionDifferent | Active | End-of-life |
| Launch PriceDifferent | 149 USD | 299 USD |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| ReviewsDifferent | 45 in our database | 105 in our database |
Clock Speeds
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Base ClockDifferent | 1485 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost ClockDifferent | 1665 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory ClockDifferent | 2001 MHz8 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz6 Gbps effective |
Memory
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Memory SizeDifferent | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory BusDifferent | 128 bit | 384 bit |
| BandwidthDifferent | 128.1 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
Render Config
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Shading UnitsDifferent | 896 | 2048 |
| TMUsDifferent | 56 | 128 |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| SM CountDifferent | 14 | N/A |
| L1 CacheDifferent | 64 KB (per SM) | 16 KB (per CU) |
| L2 CacheDifferent | 1024 KB | 768 KB |
| Compute UnitsDifferent | N/A | 32 |
Theoretical Performance
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel RateDifferent | 53.28 GPixel/s | 32.00 GPixel/s |
| Texture RateDifferent | 93.24 GTexel/s | 128.0 GTexel/s |
| FP16 (half)Different | 5.967 TFLOPS (2:1) | N/A |
| FP32 (float)Different | 2.984 TFLOPS | 4.096 TFLOPS |
| FP64 (double)Different | 93.24 GFLOPS (1:32) | 1,024.0 GFLOPS (1:4) |
Board Design
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Slot Width | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
| LengthDifferent | 229 mm9 inches | 275 mm10.8 inches |
| HeightDifferent | 111 mm4.4 inches | 109 mm4.3 inches |
| WidthDifferent | 35 mm1.4 inches | 36 mm1.4 inches |
| TDPDifferent | 75 W | 250 W |
| Suggested PSUDifferent | 250 W | 600 W |
| OutputsDifferent | 1x DVI1x HDMI 2.01x DisplayPort 1.4a | 2x DVI1x HDMI 1.4a1x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Power ConnectorsDifferent | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Board NumberDifferent | PG174 SKU 0 | C386 |
Graphics Features
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectXDifferent | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCLDifferent | 3.0 | 2.1 (1.2) |
| VulkanDifferent | 1.3 | 1.2.170 |
| CUDADifferent | 7.5 | N/A |
| Shader ModelDifferent | 6.8 | 6.5 (5.1) |
Comparison Summary
7
Specifications Compared
8
Feature Categories
51
Detailed Features
More Comparisons with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 with other GPUs of similar performance
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Performance120%
GeForce GTX 780 Ti is 20% faster than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Compare Detailed Specs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 970
GeForce GTX 970 Performance117%
GeForce GTX 970 is 17% faster than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Compare Detailed Specs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R9 290X
Radeon R9 290X Performance117%
Radeon R9 290X is 17% faster than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Compare Detailed Specs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R9 390
Radeon R9 390 Performance115%
Radeon R9 390 is 15% faster than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Compare Detailed Specs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 570
Radeon RX 570 Performance114%
Radeon RX 570 is 14% faster than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Compare Detailed Specs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R9 290
Radeon R9 290 Performance108%
Radeon R9 290 is 8% faster than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Compare Detailed Specs
More Comparisons with AMD Radeon R9 280X
Compare AMD Radeon R9 280X with other GPUs of similar performance
AMD Radeon R9 280X vs GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650 Performance116%
GeForce GTX 1650 is 16% faster than AMD Radeon R9 280X
Compare Detailed Specs
AMD Radeon R9 280X vs Radeon RX 6400
Radeon RX 6400 Performance114%
Radeon RX 6400 is 14% faster than AMD Radeon R9 280X
Compare Detailed Specs
AMD Radeon R9 280X vs Arc A380
Arc A380 Performance113%
Arc A380 is 13% faster than AMD Radeon R9 280X
Compare Detailed Specs
AMD Radeon R9 280X vs GeForce GTX 780
GeForce GTX 780 Performance112%
GeForce GTX 780 is 12% faster than AMD Radeon R9 280X
Compare Detailed Specs
AMD Radeon R9 280X vs Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition
Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition Performance102%
Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition is 2% faster than AMD Radeon R9 280X
Compare Detailed Specs
AMD Radeon R9 280X vs GeForce GTX 590
GeForce GTX 590 Performance101%
GeForce GTX 590 is 1% faster than AMD Radeon R9 280X
Compare Detailed Specs