GPU Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of specifications and performance
Performance Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
216%
216%
AMD Radeon R9 270X
62%
62%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 is approximately 154% faster
Technical Specifications
| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Graphics ProcessorDifferent | TU117 | Curacao |
| CoresDifferent | 896 | 1280 |
| TMUsDifferent | 56 | 80 |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| Memory SizeDifferent | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus WidthDifferent | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Graphics Processor
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| GPU NameDifferent | TU117 | Curacao |
| GPU VariantDifferent | TU117-300-A1 | Curacao XT(215-0848004) |
| ArchitectureDifferent | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process SizeDifferent | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| TransistorsDifferent | 4,700 million | 2,800 million |
| DensityDifferent | 23.5M / mm² | 13.2M / mm² |
| Die SizeDifferent | 200 mm² | 212 mm² |
| Chip PackageDifferent | BGA-960 | FCBGA-1737 |
Graphics Card
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Release DateDifferent | Apr 23rd, 2019 | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| GenerationDifferent | GeForce 16 | Volcanic Islands(R9 200) |
| PredecessorDifferent | GeForce 10 | Sea Islands |
| SuccessorDifferent | GeForce 20 | Pirate Islands |
| ProductionDifferent | Active | End-of-life |
| Launch PriceDifferent | 149 USD | 199 USD |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| ReviewsDifferent | 45 in our database | 90 in our database |
Clock Speeds
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Base ClockDifferent | 1485 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost ClockDifferent | 1665 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Memory ClockDifferent | 2001 MHz8 Gbps effective | 1400 MHz5.6 Gbps effective |
Memory
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Memory SizeDifferent | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory BusDifferent | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| BandwidthDifferent | 128.1 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
Render Config
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Shading UnitsDifferent | 896 | 1280 |
| TMUsDifferent | 56 | 80 |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| SM CountDifferent | 14 | N/A |
| L1 CacheDifferent | 64 KB (per SM) | 16 KB (per CU) |
| L2 CacheDifferent | 1024 KB | 512 KB |
| Compute UnitsDifferent | N/A | 20 |
Theoretical Performance
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel RateDifferent | 53.28 GPixel/s | 33.60 GPixel/s |
| Texture RateDifferent | 93.24 GTexel/s | 84.00 GTexel/s |
| FP16 (half)Different | 5.967 TFLOPS (2:1) | N/A |
| FP32 (float)Different | 2.984 TFLOPS | 2.688 TFLOPS |
| FP64 (double)Different | 93.24 GFLOPS (1:32) | 168.0 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Board Design
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Slot Width | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
| LengthDifferent | 229 mm9 inches | 241 mm9.5 inches |
| HeightDifferent | 111 mm4.4 inches | 109 mm4.3 inches |
| WidthDifferent | 35 mm1.4 inches | 36 mm1.4 inches |
| TDPDifferent | 75 W | 180 W |
| Suggested PSUDifferent | 250 W | 450 W |
| OutputsDifferent | 1x DVI1x HDMI 2.01x DisplayPort 1.4a | 2x DVI1x HDMI 1.4a1x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Power ConnectorsDifferent | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Board NumberDifferent | PG174 SKU 0 | C631, 109-C63257-00A_02, 109-C63257-12_02 |
Graphics Features
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectXDifferent | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCLDifferent | 3.0 | 2.1 (1.2) |
| VulkanDifferent | 1.3 | 1.2.170 |
| CUDADifferent | 7.5 | N/A |
| Shader ModelDifferent | 6.8 | 6.5 (5.1) |
Comparison Summary
7
Specifications Compared
8
Feature Categories
51
Detailed Features
More Comparisons with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 with other GPUs of similar performance
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Performance120%
GeForce GTX 780 Ti is 20% faster than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Compare Detailed Specs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs GeForce GTX 970
GeForce GTX 970 Performance117%
GeForce GTX 970 is 17% faster than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Compare Detailed Specs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R9 290X
Radeon R9 290X Performance117%
Radeon R9 290X is 17% faster than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Compare Detailed Specs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R9 390
Radeon R9 390 Performance115%
Radeon R9 390 is 15% faster than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Compare Detailed Specs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 570
Radeon RX 570 Performance114%
Radeon RX 570 is 14% faster than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Compare Detailed Specs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R9 290
Radeon R9 290 Performance108%
Radeon R9 290 is 8% faster than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Compare Detailed Specs
More Comparisons with AMD Radeon R9 270X
Compare AMD Radeon R9 270X with other GPUs of similar performance
AMD Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 960
GeForce GTX 960 Performance119%
GeForce GTX 960 is 19% faster than AMD Radeon R9 270X
Compare Detailed Specs
AMD Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 670
GeForce GTX 670 Performance116%
GeForce GTX 670 is 16% faster than AMD Radeon R9 270X
Compare Detailed Specs
AMD Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon HD 5970
Radeon HD 5970 Performance105%
Radeon HD 5970 is 5% faster than AMD Radeon R9 270X
Compare Detailed Specs
AMD Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 1630
GeForce GTX 1630 Performance105%
GeForce GTX 1630 is 5% faster than AMD Radeon R9 270X
Compare Detailed Specs
AMD Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 1050
GeForce GTX 1050 Performance103%
GeForce GTX 1050 is 3% faster than AMD Radeon R9 270X
Compare Detailed Specs
AMD Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 760
GeForce GTX 760 Performance102%
GeForce GTX 760 is 2% faster than AMD Radeon R9 270X
Compare Detailed Specs