GPU Comparison
Side-by-side comparison of specifications and performance
Performance Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
216%
216%
AMD Radeon R9 270X
46%
46%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is approximately 170% faster
Technical Specifications
| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Graphics ProcessorDifferent | TU116 | Curacao |
| Cores | 1280 | 1280 |
| TMUs | 80 | 80 |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| Memory SizeDifferent | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory TypeDifferent | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus WidthDifferent | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Graphics Processor
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| GPU NameDifferent | TU116 | Curacao |
| GPU VariantDifferent | TU116-250-KA-A1 | Curacao XT(215-0848004) |
| ArchitectureDifferent | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |
| Process SizeDifferent | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| TransistorsDifferent | 6,600 million | 2,800 million |
| DensityDifferent | 23.2M / mm² | 13.2M / mm² |
| Die SizeDifferent | 284 mm² | 212 mm² |
| Chip PackageDifferent | BGA-2228 | FCBGA-1737 |
Graphics Card
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Release DateDifferent | Nov 22nd, 2019 | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| GenerationDifferent | GeForce 16 | Volcanic Islands(R9 200) |
| PredecessorDifferent | GeForce 10 | Sea Islands |
| SuccessorDifferent | GeForce 20 | Pirate Islands |
| ProductionDifferent | Active | End-of-life |
| Launch PriceDifferent | 159 USD | 199 USD |
| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| ReviewsDifferent | 27 in our database | 90 in our database |
Clock Speeds
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Base ClockDifferent | 1530 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost ClockDifferent | 1725 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Memory ClockDifferent | 1500 MHz12 Gbps effective | 1400 MHz5.6 Gbps effective |
Memory
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Memory SizeDifferent | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory TypeDifferent | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory BusDifferent | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| BandwidthDifferent | 192.0 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
Render Config
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1280 |
| TMUs | 80 | 80 |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| SM CountDifferent | 20 | N/A |
| L1 CacheDifferent | 64 KB (per SM) | 16 KB (per CU) |
| L2 CacheDifferent | 1024 KB | 512 KB |
| Compute UnitsDifferent | N/A | 20 |
Theoretical Performance
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel RateDifferent | 55.20 GPixel/s | 33.60 GPixel/s |
| Texture RateDifferent | 138.0 GTexel/s | 84.00 GTexel/s |
| FP16 (half)Different | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) | N/A |
| FP32 (float)Different | 4.416 TFLOPS | 2.688 TFLOPS |
| FP64 (double)Different | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | 168.0 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Board Design
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| Slot Width | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
| LengthDifferent | 229 mm9 inches | 241 mm9.5 inches |
| HeightDifferent | 111 mm4.4 inches | 109 mm4.3 inches |
| WidthDifferent | 35 mm1.4 inches | 36 mm1.4 inches |
| TDPDifferent | 100 W | 180 W |
| Suggested PSUDifferent | 300 W | 450 W |
| OutputsDifferent | 1x DVI1x HDMI 2.01x DisplayPort 1.4a | 2x DVI1x HDMI 1.4a1x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Power ConnectorsDifferent | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Board NumberDifferent | PG166 SKU 24 | C631, 109-C63257-00A_02, 109-C63257-12_02 |
Graphics Features
| Feature | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectXDifferent | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCLDifferent | 3.0 | 2.1 (1.2) |
| VulkanDifferent | 1.3 | 1.2.170 |
| CUDADifferent | 7.5 | N/A |
| Shader ModelDifferent | 6.8 | 6.5 (5.1) |
Comparison Summary
7
Specifications Compared
8
Feature Categories
51
Detailed Features
More Comparisons with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER with other GPUs of similar performance
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GeForce GTX 980 Ti Performance114%
GeForce GTX 980 Ti is 14% faster than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Compare Detailed Specs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB Performance114%
GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB is 14% faster than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Compare Detailed Specs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon R9 FURY X
Radeon R9 FURY X Performance112%
Radeon R9 FURY X is 12% faster than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Compare Detailed Specs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660 Performance111%
GeForce GTX 1660 is 11% faster than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Compare Detailed Specs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon RX 590
Radeon RX 590 Performance105%
Radeon RX 590 is 5% faster than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Compare Detailed Specs
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Radeon R9 FURY
Radeon R9 FURY Performance102%
Radeon R9 FURY is 2% faster than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Compare Detailed Specs
More Comparisons with AMD Radeon R9 270X
Compare AMD Radeon R9 270X with other GPUs of similar performance
AMD Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 960
GeForce GTX 960 Performance119%
GeForce GTX 960 is 19% faster than AMD Radeon R9 270X
Compare Detailed Specs
AMD Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 670
GeForce GTX 670 Performance116%
GeForce GTX 670 is 16% faster than AMD Radeon R9 270X
Compare Detailed Specs
AMD Radeon R9 270X vs Radeon HD 5970
Radeon HD 5970 Performance105%
Radeon HD 5970 is 5% faster than AMD Radeon R9 270X
Compare Detailed Specs
AMD Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 1630
GeForce GTX 1630 Performance105%
GeForce GTX 1630 is 5% faster than AMD Radeon R9 270X
Compare Detailed Specs
AMD Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 1050
GeForce GTX 1050 Performance103%
GeForce GTX 1050 is 3% faster than AMD Radeon R9 270X
Compare Detailed Specs
AMD Radeon R9 270X vs GeForce GTX 760
GeForce GTX 760 Performance102%
GeForce GTX 760 is 2% faster than AMD Radeon R9 270X
Compare Detailed Specs